Okudzeto Ablakwa Challenges CHRAJ's Verdict on Rev. Victor Kusi-Boateng's Double Identity Allegations

North Tongu MP Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa has launched a scathing critique of the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) following its dismissal of allegations against Reverend Victor Kusi-Boateng, also known as Kwabena Adu Gyamfi.

Ablakwa contends that CHRAJ’s report on the controversial double-identity saga ignored crucial evidence, undermining the credibility of the investigation.

The MP's concerns, presented with documented evidence, raise serious questions about the transparency of CHRAJ's investigation.

1. Conflicting Official Records

Ablakwa noted discrepancies in Rev. Kusi-Boateng’s official records, particularly in the documents submitted to the National Cathedral Secretariat and those linked to his diplomatic passport.

• National Cathedral Records: The incorporation documents list him as “Victor Kusi-Boateng,” born on September 7, 1971.
• Diplomatic Passport: The passport issued for official duties bears the name “Kwabena Adu Gyamfi,” born on December 30, 1969.

Ablakwa questioned how the same individual could possess two official identities with conflicting details, a claim CHRAJ failed to address.

2. Ghana Revenue Authority (GRA) Evidence

The Ghana Revenue Authority's database reportedly contains separate profiles for Victor Kusi-Boateng and Kwabena Adu Gyamfi.

• TINs and Birthdates: The names are linked to different Tax Identification Numbers (TINs) and dates of birth.
• Maternal Records: The records also show different mothers for the two identities.

Ablakwa criticized CHRAJ for not incorporating this evidence into its findings.

3. Driver’s License and National Identification Authority Records

Evidence from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) and National Identification Authority (NIA) revealed further inconsistencies.

• DVLA Records: A driver’s license was issued to “Victor Kusi-Boateng.”
• NIA Database: A Ghana Card was issued to “Kwabena Adu Gyamfi.”

These records suggest that both names were used interchangeably for official documentation.

4. Electoral Commission Records

CHRAJ also failed to reconcile discrepancies in voter registration data:

• 2016 Voter ID: Issued to “Victor Kusi-Boateng,” showing an age of 40.
• 2020 Voter ID: Issued to “Kwabena Adu Gyamfi,” with an age of 50—suggesting a 10-year age increase within four years.

Ablakwa argued that these contradictions warranted further scrutiny.

5. High Court Judgment on the Case

In a July 2023 ruling, a High Court judge dismissed a case filed by Rev. Kusi-Boateng, with the court stating that his actions bordered on criminality. Ablakwa highlighted this as critical evidence of wrongdoing that CHRAJ ignored.

Ablakwa’s Criticism of CHRAJ’s Report

Ablakwa accused CHRAJ of neglecting vital evidence, including:

• Failure to Access Key Databases: CHRAJ reportedly did not consult the GRA, DVLA, NIA, or Electoral Commission databases for verification.
• Overlooking Judicial Findings: The Commission disregarded the High Court’s ruling, which described Rev. Kusi-Boateng’s conduct as questionable.
• Ignoring Reputational Implications: By dismissing the evidence, CHRAJ risks damaging its credibility and undermining public trust.

Conclusion

Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa has vowed to continue pursuing the matter, emphasizing that the alleged double identity and its implications on governance must be addressed. He called on Ghanaians to demand accountability from CHRAJ and other public institutions to safeguard transparency and the rule of law.

This case, which touches on issues of integrity, abuse of office, and public trust, remains one of the most contentious in recent times.

Source: Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa